Which equipment has the most downtime? Which is under-utilised? Which costs more in maintenance than it would to replace? ZenoHosp Asset analytics answers all of these — so capital expenditure decisions are made on data, not opinion.
Every breakdown is logged in ZenoHosp with the date, duration, failure description, and resolution. ZenoHosp aggregates this into downtime reports — total downtime per equipment, average repair time, most frequent failure modes. Chronically unreliable equipment is identified before management hears about it from clinical staff.
Utilisation rate shows how many hours each piece of equipment is actually used versus how many hours it's available. Under-utilised high-value equipment — an MRI running at 40% capacity — represents poor capital allocation. Over-utilised equipment is at higher breakdown risk.
Cumulative maintenance cost per equipment is tracked in ZenoHosp — every labour and parts cost for every service event. When cumulative maintenance cost approaches or exceeds the residual value, ZenoHosp surfaces this comparison. Management can make the replace-or-maintain decision with hard numbers.
"We had a 6-year-old X-ray machine that the biomedical team said needed replacement. ZenoHosp showed it had ₹4.8 lakh in maintenance costs over 3 years but was still at 68% utilisation. We repaired it instead. Still running fine."
Every capability — built for Indian hospital workflows.
Every breakdown is logged in ZenoHosp with the date, duration, failure description, and resolution. Downtime reports aggregate these events — showing total downtime per equipment, average repair time, and most frequent failure modes.
Utilisation rate is the percentage of available hours that the equipment is actually used. For an MRI with 16 available hours per day, a 50% utilisation rate means 8 hours of actual scanning. ZenoHosp calculates this from the usage records.
ZenoHosp shows cumulative maintenance cost alongside the equipment's residual book value. When maintenance costs exceed a configurable threshold of the original purchase price, the equipment is flagged for replacement review.